It's proving very hard to track down my old reviews that weren't put in the featured reviews section, and "extended preview" writings on Head-Fi. The longer I left doing this, the harder to find those p/reviews would have become. Part of this is my fault: I should have put something very clear in the title to identify them later, but I didn't. It looks like it might take a while to hunt down all my more substantial writings on Head-Fi. Don't hold your breath. Meanwhile, I'm sure there will be more actually new posts.
Friday, January 28, 2005
Tuesday, January 25, 2005
Testing, testing
I sometimes get asked: What do you test phones/sources/cables/etc with?
I have set 'virtual albums' which I use to select the stuff I actually want to keep. But in order for a review of something to be useful, you've got to cover a wide range of bases... there's not much point in reviewing based on just the music you like. The test tracks get chosen for a variety of reasons... specific tones or whole passages, the quality of production (or indeed, the lack of production quality), vocal tics, etc.
Here's a sample of the #1 track list I used to test the MDR-XD200, the latest phone to be listened to. It's fairly representative of the variety that I'd pick to test out a phone.
It's also important to test based on the intended primary use of the phone. For example there is no point sitting at home listening to and reviewing your Shure/Etymotic canalphones... some may use the phones in this manner, but the vast majority won't.
While I was writing my notes, because I was talking about it as an office/home phone and it is a very low-cost phone, I listened to the tracks from both their 256K MP3 rips on iTunes unamped from a PC in a quiet office environment, and also most of the tracks from the headphone jack of a mini system and one-box HT system at home. Of course I'll be listening to it from my more usual set-ups, but I'll always try and base the review on use within the sort of environments that the phone will be put in.
I have set 'virtual albums' which I use to select the stuff I actually want to keep. But in order for a review of something to be useful, you've got to cover a wide range of bases... there's not much point in reviewing based on just the music you like. The test tracks get chosen for a variety of reasons... specific tones or whole passages, the quality of production (or indeed, the lack of production quality), vocal tics, etc.
Here's a sample of the #1 track list I used to test the MDR-XD200, the latest phone to be listened to. It's fairly representative of the variety that I'd pick to test out a phone.
It's also important to test based on the intended primary use of the phone. For example there is no point sitting at home listening to and reviewing your Shure/Etymotic canalphones... some may use the phones in this manner, but the vast majority won't.
While I was writing my notes, because I was talking about it as an office/home phone and it is a very low-cost phone, I listened to the tracks from both their 256K MP3 rips on iTunes unamped from a PC in a quiet office environment, and also most of the tracks from the headphone jack of a mini system and one-box HT system at home. Of course I'll be listening to it from my more usual set-ups, but I'll always try and base the review on use within the sort of environments that the phone will be put in.
Monday, January 24, 2005
Sunday, January 23, 2005
Sony MDR-XD200 Review
The chances of you being able to buy a low-cost closed phone from Sony which sounds anywhere near acceptable has been, in my view, marginally less likely than the Apocalypse.
Sony isn't a company which I associate with good low-end closed headphones. The MDR-V500DJ (actually not so low-end in terms of what most people are willing to pay) is one of the few headphones that I have actually dumped in the bin. The very popular (in terms of sales to the general public) MDR-V300DJ is if anything even more crappy, with absolutely awful 'badly closed phone' acoustics. Just generally, low-end Sony headphones seem to be pretty dire. The newer-generation (open backed) MDR-G74SL was however a nice surprise, being an acceptable phone and better than I expected for a very low cost, mass-market portable phone.
Recently, a friend of mine asked me what he should buy for office use on a budget of £20 ($35~$40). I didn't really have a definite idea what to recommend, except for say "spend more", but one of the alternatives he presented to me was the brand new Sony MDR-XD200 (for £20). The new XD range has just come out in Japan, and I was quite surprised to see that they are available in the UK already. I nominated him for guinea pig role, and said he should buy the XD. He's not really what I would call a critical listener, so I was assuming that even if they were only marginally crappier than the MDR-G74SL, he'd probably be happy. So, we got together the next day and he turned out to be very pleased with the choice. I also had to have a listen out of my laptop, and...
"What was that?"
"What?"
"Did you just see four really underfed looking guys on horses go past?"
"What're you talking about?"
"Cloaked, one of them carrying a large farm implement?"
"Huh?"
"Um... Never mind."
These sounded good. REALLY good. Of course, my expectations were low but still... there was undeniably a hi-fi patina about these phones without all the bad things that usually accompany low-end Sony closed headphones. Three hours later, I got one for myself.
The cups look oval in most views of the XD series, but they are actually circular.
TECHNICAL
The closed-back, circumaural XD200 has 40mm drivers claimed to be 'long stroke'. Efficiency is a decent 102db/mw and the impedance is 70 ohms @ 1khz. The phone ships terminated with a 3.5mm jack, with a 6.5mm converter plug. The MDR-XD200 has angled drivers.
SOUND
It's actually got a very nice mild tone, which resolves more than sufficiently for a phone of this price yet doesn't display any traces of sibilance or nasty shrill highs. It's all quite a bit smoother than you expect for this budget. There is a tendency to gloss over some detail, but I can live with the tradeoff for this little money. Bass is very firmly planted with a good bloom without overextending into mush. Staging is less 2-D than some $200+ phones I've had. Although the staging is not large, environmental cues are certainly represented correctly. I can use words like 'instrument separation' without falling off my chair laughing. I have to say this is pretty disconcerting. I'm sitting here writing this post, listening directly out of my PC and I'm still looking out of the window, just in case the Seraphim start putting on an airshow.
SOUND MODE SWITCH
One of the unique selling points of the XD200 is the Sound Mode Switch on the underside of both the cups, which allow you to trigger 'music' or 'movie' mode. The music mode leaves the signal unaltered, while the movie mode introduces a rather unsophisticated bass boost circuit. Unsophisticated it may be, but it really works. It's mostly mid-bass, to introduce extra extended 'boom' to whatever you're listening to. If your listening style is of the less refined variety, of course there's nothing stopping you using it for music of course.
BUILD
Squeaks and creaks are expected on a £20 phone, and the XD200 does indeed squeak and creak a little. However, it is put together with a competent level of build quality for this budget. Structural parts are screwed on, and looked after this isn't liable to fall apart. Seen from a distance, the XD200 looks more expensive than it is. The 3m-ish single-sided cord is covered with an elastomer material, which is prone to certain amounts of snagging... but looks reasonably robust.
ISOLATION
The XD200 is closed, but doesn't really isolate. Provided your head gets a seal against the cushions, leakage is next to none, so your coworkers will remain undisturbed.
SIZE
While not quite at ATH-A900 bulk, the XD200 nevertheless sticks out quite a lot and is fairly large. Definitely home / office cans.
COMFORT
Pretty good for a closed phone with pleather earpads. The only flaw is that the lower rubber half of the headband doesn't have enough room to extend to provide a cushion before your head meets the hard plastic part of the band. The phone is lighter than most (220g quoted) and sits stably on the head. The asymmetrical earpads provide good placement and location around the ears.
FINAL WORDS
The low-end closed headphone market has a worthy new entry in the form of the MDR-XD200. While it's not quite a Beyerdynamic DT231, it is a smoother, warmer and agreeable alternative, with a neat party trick for those rap tracks. It's pretty efficient for a full sized can (much more so than the DT231), fairly comfy and it doesn't leak. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go finish that angel-proof shelter... the Apocalypse is upon us.
UK residents can buy from Argos
Sony link (Japanese) : MDR-XD200
ADDENDUM
A wizard suggestion by a Hi-Fi designer lead to me opening up these phones. And some additional clarifications are in order.
First, the phones are semi-closed. There's a small gap around where the cushions sit, which is effectively open to the outside. This explains the lack of isolation, but because of the placing of the gap, it also explains the comparative lack of leakage to those situated beside the phone-wearer.
Secondly, the bass boost circuit is not electronic. There's a spring-loaded vent on the phone, situation within the inner earcup area which directly faces the ear.
The "Music" setting leaves this vent closed.
Sliding the switch to "Movie" lifts open the vent.
Fascinating, very simple and effective.
Sony isn't a company which I associate with good low-end closed headphones. The MDR-V500DJ (actually not so low-end in terms of what most people are willing to pay) is one of the few headphones that I have actually dumped in the bin. The very popular (in terms of sales to the general public) MDR-V300DJ is if anything even more crappy, with absolutely awful 'badly closed phone' acoustics. Just generally, low-end Sony headphones seem to be pretty dire. The newer-generation (open backed) MDR-G74SL was however a nice surprise, being an acceptable phone and better than I expected for a very low cost, mass-market portable phone.
Recently, a friend of mine asked me what he should buy for office use on a budget of £20 ($35~$40). I didn't really have a definite idea what to recommend, except for say "spend more", but one of the alternatives he presented to me was the brand new Sony MDR-XD200 (for £20). The new XD range has just come out in Japan, and I was quite surprised to see that they are available in the UK already. I nominated him for guinea pig role, and said he should buy the XD. He's not really what I would call a critical listener, so I was assuming that even if they were only marginally crappier than the MDR-G74SL, he'd probably be happy. So, we got together the next day and he turned out to be very pleased with the choice. I also had to have a listen out of my laptop, and...
"What was that?"
"What?"
"Did you just see four really underfed looking guys on horses go past?"
"What're you talking about?"
"Cloaked, one of them carrying a large farm implement?"
"Huh?"
"Um... Never mind."
These sounded good. REALLY good. Of course, my expectations were low but still... there was undeniably a hi-fi patina about these phones without all the bad things that usually accompany low-end Sony closed headphones. Three hours later, I got one for myself.
The cups look oval in most views of the XD series, but they are actually circular.
TECHNICAL
The closed-back, circumaural XD200 has 40mm drivers claimed to be 'long stroke'. Efficiency is a decent 102db/mw and the impedance is 70 ohms @ 1khz. The phone ships terminated with a 3.5mm jack, with a 6.5mm converter plug. The MDR-XD200 has angled drivers.
SOUND
It's actually got a very nice mild tone, which resolves more than sufficiently for a phone of this price yet doesn't display any traces of sibilance or nasty shrill highs. It's all quite a bit smoother than you expect for this budget. There is a tendency to gloss over some detail, but I can live with the tradeoff for this little money. Bass is very firmly planted with a good bloom without overextending into mush. Staging is less 2-D than some $200+ phones I've had. Although the staging is not large, environmental cues are certainly represented correctly. I can use words like 'instrument separation' without falling off my chair laughing. I have to say this is pretty disconcerting. I'm sitting here writing this post, listening directly out of my PC and I'm still looking out of the window, just in case the Seraphim start putting on an airshow.
SOUND MODE SWITCH
One of the unique selling points of the XD200 is the Sound Mode Switch on the underside of both the cups, which allow you to trigger 'music' or 'movie' mode. The music mode leaves the signal unaltered, while the movie mode introduces a rather unsophisticated bass boost circuit. Unsophisticated it may be, but it really works. It's mostly mid-bass, to introduce extra extended 'boom' to whatever you're listening to. If your listening style is of the less refined variety, of course there's nothing stopping you using it for music of course.
BUILD
Squeaks and creaks are expected on a £20 phone, and the XD200 does indeed squeak and creak a little. However, it is put together with a competent level of build quality for this budget. Structural parts are screwed on, and looked after this isn't liable to fall apart. Seen from a distance, the XD200 looks more expensive than it is. The 3m-ish single-sided cord is covered with an elastomer material, which is prone to certain amounts of snagging... but looks reasonably robust.
ISOLATION
The XD200 is closed, but doesn't really isolate. Provided your head gets a seal against the cushions, leakage is next to none, so your coworkers will remain undisturbed.
SIZE
While not quite at ATH-A900 bulk, the XD200 nevertheless sticks out quite a lot and is fairly large. Definitely home / office cans.
COMFORT
Pretty good for a closed phone with pleather earpads. The only flaw is that the lower rubber half of the headband doesn't have enough room to extend to provide a cushion before your head meets the hard plastic part of the band. The phone is lighter than most (220g quoted) and sits stably on the head. The asymmetrical earpads provide good placement and location around the ears.
FINAL WORDS
The low-end closed headphone market has a worthy new entry in the form of the MDR-XD200. While it's not quite a Beyerdynamic DT231, it is a smoother, warmer and agreeable alternative, with a neat party trick for those rap tracks. It's pretty efficient for a full sized can (much more so than the DT231), fairly comfy and it doesn't leak. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go finish that angel-proof shelter... the Apocalypse is upon us.
UK residents can buy from Argos
Sony link (Japanese) : MDR-XD200
ADDENDUM
A wizard suggestion by a Hi-Fi designer lead to me opening up these phones. And some additional clarifications are in order.
First, the phones are semi-closed. There's a small gap around where the cushions sit, which is effectively open to the outside. This explains the lack of isolation, but because of the placing of the gap, it also explains the comparative lack of leakage to those situated beside the phone-wearer.
Secondly, the bass boost circuit is not electronic. There's a spring-loaded vent on the phone, situation within the inner earcup area which directly faces the ear.
The "Music" setting leaves this vent closed.
Sliding the switch to "Movie" lifts open the vent.
Fascinating, very simple and effective.
Saturday, January 22, 2005
The sort of K2 of the headphone world.
I don't think I can quite justify covering all the bases headphone-wise to include the Sennheiser Orpheus, so these two will have to do.
(Click for bigger picture from my Head-Fi image archives)
The spacialis(z?)ation problem is not going away afer pretty extensive burn-in so far. Let's hope it disappears during the next couple of weeks. I'm hoping that more extensive wear will perhaps help to 'dampen down' the cellulose baffles with moisture and body oils (let's all puke together) and get rid of some issues.
If not... well, the Q010 may be winging their way back to Japan again for repair. Even just listening to the phones by themselves for a long time, I can't quite agree at this time that the way it sounds is right. The way these phones resolve is something else, but there are what I consider major problems in staging.
(Click for bigger picture from my Head-Fi image archives)
If not... well, the Q010 may be winging their way back to Japan again for repair. Even just listening to the phones by themselves for a long time, I can't quite agree at this time that the way it sounds is right. The way these phones resolve is something else, but there are what I consider major problems in staging.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)